The Reuters news agency corrected a story on Monday that the Humanitarian Foundation Gaza (GHF), an organization supported by the United States, would have suggested creating “fields” for Palestinians while the Hamas group, considered a terrorist, was dismantled in the Gaza Strip
GHF harshly criticized the news, calling it “clickbait with bad faith” and stating that the goal was to generate controversy, not seek the truth.
What happened?
The original article, entitled “Exclusive: US -supported aid group proposed ‘Humanitarian Traffic Areas’ for Palestinians in Gaza,” said GHF presented a $ 2 billion plan to build “large -scale volunteer fields” where Gaza’s population could “temporarily reside, be discharged, reintegrated and prepared to move, if they wanted to”.
According to Reuters, the document was named by GHF on the cover and SRS, which works with GHF, on several pages, and was sent to the US Embassy in Jerusalem and Donald Trump’s government.
After the controversy, Reuters corrected the matter, admitting that it was not possible to confirm who created or sent the document.
The agency also removed a previous post to clarify this point.
The corrected version says that the plan mentioned the construction of fields inside – and possibly out – of Gaza, with the objective of “replacing Hamas control over the population.”
GHF Answer
GHF denied any involvement with the plan.
“Another day, another fake headline,” wrote the organization.
They said they never saw, created or participated in the presentation mentioned by Reuters.
GHF asked to see the document, but the agency refused to share it.
“We said clearly: GHF is unrelated to humanitarian traffic areas, has no plans for it, and this presentation is not ours,” the organization said.
“Even so, they published the story.”
GHF accused Reuters of practicing a sensational journalism based on sources of bad faith, with the aim of creating controversy rather than informing the truth.
Other reactions#y#
The US State Department refused to comment on the supposed plan, but a high government official said “none of this is being considered.”
The situation shows how news can generate misunderstandings when based on unconfirmed information.
So far, there is no evidence that GHF has proposed the “fields” mentioned.
Published in 07/08/2025 12h35
Text adapted by AI (Grok) and translated via Google API in the English version. Images from public image libraries or credits in the caption.
Reference article:
| Geoprocessing Drone Systems HPC |
| ERP and CRM Systems Mobile Systems AI |